- It wasn’t just rich Americans that profited from Fed-fueled market rallies. The global elite benefitted, too.
- Rate cuts sparked a buying spree in the housing market and led investors to bid stocks higher.
- As the Fed goes, so goes the world’s economy, and the fortunes of the global elite.
saved the economy during the pandemic, and, in doing so, made America’s wealthy class wealthier.
But they aren’t alone. The entire global elite benefited from the actions America’s central bank took to prevent economic catastrophe.
The global rebound from virus-fueled
has featured extraordinary rallies across asset classes. Global stocks surged 33% above pre-pandemic levels and home prices rocketed higher all across the globe.
Both trends were largely powered by the Fed. The central bank pulled interest rates close to zero and started buying Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities in March 2020 to bolster financial markets and encourage spending.
The emergency actions indirectly boosted major markets. Expectations for years of easy monetary conditions led investors to furiously bid stocks higher. The rate cuts also kicked off a homebuying frenzy as people rushed to lock in rock-bottom mortgage rates.
The Fed led the way, and similar outlooks from other central banks saw such activity spread around the world. Global home prices rose at the fastest pace in four decades and show “little sign of stopping,” JPMorgan economists led by Joseph Lupton said Monday. Intense home-price growth emerged in the US, Turkey, Russia, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, and Czechia, they added.
The global stock and housing rallies padded the pockets of those best prepared to weather the pandemic. The world’s wealthy class has the most exposure to both markets. And unlike the late 2000s, the global elite is benefitting from two market surges at once.
Not quite déjà vu
The Great Recession saw home prices nosedive as the US housing bubble popped. JPMorgan’s home-price index nearly halved through the crisis before recovering over several years.
Things are different this time.
Instead of plummeting like in 2008, home prices in developed economies bounced to fresh highs throughout the pandemic. And while global stock prices have retraced some of their recent gains, they still sit well above their pre-COVID highs. Central bank policy, then, is serving to prop up the global wealthy class more than in the late 2000s.
That surge brings new risks to central banks already in crisis mode, JPMorgan said. For one, leaping home prices could lift housing-service prices and drive inflation to uncomfortable highs.
Periods of outstanding home-price appreciation are also associated with greater borrowing and heightened risk. That could raise fears of another market bubble just as central banks are looking to pare back their aid, the bank said.
“With the Global Financial Crisis still fresh in central bank thinking, the ongoing surge in house prices with little sign of abating adds to the risk of an earlier removal of monetary policy supports,” the team added.
And while the Fed hasn’t yet changed its policy stance, some officials have raised concerns around how easy money is affecting the housing market.
The Fed’s purchases of mortgage-backed securities could be having “some unintended consequences and side effects,” Robert Kaplan, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, said in May.
St. Louis Fed President James Bullard was even clearer in his worry.
“Maybe we don’t need to be in mortgage-backed securities with a booming housing market,” Bullard said on CNBC in June. “We don’t want to get back in the housing bubble game that caused us a lot of distress in the 2000s.”
Finally, there was one striking example of the wealthy possibly benefitting from monetary policy decisions made by the central bank: stock trades by Fed officials themselves.
Kaplan and Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren announced last week they would sell all of their individual stock holdings by September 30 after disclosures of their trading during the pandemic prompted ethics concerns. Kaplan caught flak for several trades worth at least $1 million, while Rosengren held stakes in four real estate investment trusts. Nonetheless, the trades happened amid a stock boom the Fed helped create.